diff options
author | LinuxWizard42 <computerwizard@linuxmail.org> | 2022-10-12 23:08:57 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | LinuxWizard42 <computerwizard@linuxmail.org> | 2022-10-12 23:08:57 +0300 |
commit | 726b81b19251674e149ccfbb1abacbd837fc6db0 (patch) | |
tree | fbdbb227dc01357eb76e8222d76185bc124c5ca6 /node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md | |
parent | 34f0890e175698940d49238097579f44e4d78c89 (diff) | |
download | FlashRunner-726b81b19251674e149ccfbb1abacbd837fc6db0.tar.gz FlashRunner-726b81b19251674e149ccfbb1abacbd837fc6db0.tar.zst |
Removed files that should not have been included in git
Diffstat (limited to 'node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md')
-rw-r--r-- | node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md | 36 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md b/node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6c927ec..0000000 --- a/node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,36 +0,0 @@ -The package exports an array of strings. Each string is an identifier -for a license exception under the [Software Package Data Exchange -(SPDX)][SPDX] software license metadata standard. - -[SPDX]: https://spdx.org - -## Copyright and Licensing - -### SPDX - -"SPDX" is a federally registered United States trademark of The Linux -Foundation Corporation. - -From version 2.0 of the [SPDX] specification: - -> Copyright © 2010-2015 Linux Foundation and its Contributors. Licensed -> under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 Unported. All other -> rights are expressly reserved. - -The Linux Foundation and the SPDX working groups are good people. Only -they decide what "SPDX" means, as a standard and otherwise. I respect -their work and their rights. You should, too. - -### This Package - -> I created this package by copying exception identifiers out of the -> SPDX specification. That work was mechanical, routine, and required no -> creativity whatsoever. - Kyle Mitchell, package author - -United States users concerned about intellectual property may wish to -discuss the following Supreme Court decisions with their attorneys: - -- _Baker v. Selden_, 101 U.S. 99 (1879) - -- _Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co._, - 499 U.S. 340 (1991) |