diff options
author | LinuxWizard42 <computerwizard@linuxmail.org> | 2022-10-12 22:54:37 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | LinuxWizard42 <computerwizard@linuxmail.org> | 2022-10-12 22:54:37 +0300 |
commit | 703e03aba33f234712206769f57717ba7d92d23d (patch) | |
tree | 0041f04ccb75bd5379c764e9fe42249fffe75fc3 /node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md | |
parent | ab6e257e6e9d9a483d7e86f220d8b209a2cd7753 (diff) | |
download | FlashRunner-703e03aba33f234712206769f57717ba7d92d23d.tar.gz FlashRunner-703e03aba33f234712206769f57717ba7d92d23d.tar.zst |
Added export_allowed file to make repository visible in cgit
Diffstat (limited to 'node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md')
-rw-r--r-- | node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md | 36 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md b/node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6c927ec --- /dev/null +++ b/node_modules/spdx-exceptions/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +The package exports an array of strings. Each string is an identifier +for a license exception under the [Software Package Data Exchange +(SPDX)][SPDX] software license metadata standard. + +[SPDX]: https://spdx.org + +## Copyright and Licensing + +### SPDX + +"SPDX" is a federally registered United States trademark of The Linux +Foundation Corporation. + +From version 2.0 of the [SPDX] specification: + +> Copyright © 2010-2015 Linux Foundation and its Contributors. Licensed +> under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 Unported. All other +> rights are expressly reserved. + +The Linux Foundation and the SPDX working groups are good people. Only +they decide what "SPDX" means, as a standard and otherwise. I respect +their work and their rights. You should, too. + +### This Package + +> I created this package by copying exception identifiers out of the +> SPDX specification. That work was mechanical, routine, and required no +> creativity whatsoever. - Kyle Mitchell, package author + +United States users concerned about intellectual property may wish to +discuss the following Supreme Court decisions with their attorneys: + +- _Baker v. Selden_, 101 U.S. 99 (1879) + +- _Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co._, + 499 U.S. 340 (1991) |