diff options
author | LinuxWizard42 <computerwizard@linuxmail.org> | 2022-10-12 23:08:57 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | LinuxWizard42 <computerwizard@linuxmail.org> | 2022-10-12 23:08:57 +0300 |
commit | 726b81b19251674e149ccfbb1abacbd837fc6db0 (patch) | |
tree | fbdbb227dc01357eb76e8222d76185bc124c5ca6 /node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md | |
parent | 34f0890e175698940d49238097579f44e4d78c89 (diff) | |
download | FlashRunner-726b81b19251674e149ccfbb1abacbd837fc6db0.tar.gz FlashRunner-726b81b19251674e149ccfbb1abacbd837fc6db0.tar.zst |
Removed files that should not have been included in git
Diffstat (limited to 'node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md')
-rw-r--r-- | node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md | 39 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md b/node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6a928ed..0000000 --- a/node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ -# ansi-regex [](https://travis-ci.org/chalk/ansi-regex) - -> Regular expression for matching [ANSI escape codes](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code) - - -## Install - -``` -$ npm install --save ansi-regex -``` - - -## Usage - -```js -const ansiRegex = require('ansi-regex'); - -ansiRegex().test('\u001b[4mcake\u001b[0m'); -//=> true - -ansiRegex().test('cake'); -//=> false - -'\u001b[4mcake\u001b[0m'.match(ansiRegex()); -//=> ['\u001b[4m', '\u001b[0m'] -``` - -## FAQ - -### Why do you test for codes not in the ECMA 48 standard? - -Some of the codes we run as a test are codes that we acquired finding various lists of non-standard or manufacturer specific codes. If I recall correctly, we test for both standard and non-standard codes, as most of them follow the same or similar format and can be safely matched in strings without the risk of removing actual string content. There are a few non-standard control codes that do not follow the traditional format (i.e. they end in numbers) thus forcing us to exclude them from the test because we cannot reliably match them. - -On the historical side, those ECMA standards were established in the early 90's whereas the VT100, for example, was designed in the mid/late 70's. At that point in time, control codes were still pretty ungoverned and engineers used them for a multitude of things, namely to activate hardware ports that may have been proprietary. Somewhere else you see a similar 'anarchy' of codes is in the x86 architecture for processors; there are a ton of "interrupts" that can mean different things on certain brands of processors, most of which have been phased out. - - -## License - -MIT © [Sindre Sorhus](http://sindresorhus.com) |