From 726b81b19251674e149ccfbb1abacbd837fc6db0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: LinuxWizard42 <computerwizard@linuxmail.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:08:57 +0300
Subject: Removed files that should not have been included in git

---
 .../validate-npm-package-license/README.md         | 113 ---------------------
 1 file changed, 113 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 node_modules/validate-npm-package-license/README.md

(limited to 'node_modules/validate-npm-package-license/README.md')

diff --git a/node_modules/validate-npm-package-license/README.md b/node_modules/validate-npm-package-license/README.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 702bc7b..0000000
--- a/node_modules/validate-npm-package-license/README.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,113 +0,0 @@
-validate-npm-package-license
-============================
-
-Give me a string and I'll tell you if it's a valid npm package license string.
-
-```javascript
-var valid = require('validate-npm-package-license');
-```
-
-SPDX license identifiers are valid license strings:
-
-```javascript
-
-var assert = require('assert');
-var validSPDXExpression = {
-  validForNewPackages: true,
-  validForOldPackages: true,
-  spdx: true
-};
-
-assert.deepEqual(valid('MIT'), validSPDXExpression);
-assert.deepEqual(valid('BSD-2-Clause'), validSPDXExpression);
-assert.deepEqual(valid('Apache-2.0'), validSPDXExpression);
-assert.deepEqual(valid('ISC'), validSPDXExpression);
-```
-The function will return a warning and suggestion for nearly-correct license identifiers:
-
-```javascript
-assert.deepEqual(
-  valid('Apache 2.0'),
-  {
-    validForOldPackages: false,
-    validForNewPackages: false,
-    warnings: [
-      'license should be ' +
-      'a valid SPDX license expression (without "LicenseRef"), ' +
-      '"UNLICENSED", or ' +
-      '"SEE LICENSE IN <filename>"',
-      'license is similar to the valid expression "Apache-2.0"'
-    ]
-  }
-);
-```
-
-SPDX expressions are valid, too ...
-
-```javascript
-// Simple SPDX license expression for dual licensing
-assert.deepEqual(
-  valid('(GPL-3.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)'),
-  validSPDXExpression
-);
-```
-
-... except if they contain `LicenseRef`:
-
-```javascript
-var warningAboutLicenseRef = {
-  validForOldPackages: false,
-  validForNewPackages: false,
-  spdx: true,
-  warnings: [
-    'license should be ' +
-    'a valid SPDX license expression (without "LicenseRef"), ' +
-    '"UNLICENSED", or ' +
-    '"SEE LICENSE IN <filename>"',
-  ]
-};
-
-assert.deepEqual(
-  valid('LicenseRef-Made-Up'),
-  warningAboutLicenseRef
-);
-
-assert.deepEqual(
-  valid('(MIT OR LicenseRef-Made-Up)'),
-  warningAboutLicenseRef
-);
-```
-
-If you can't describe your licensing terms with standardized SPDX identifiers, put the terms in a file in the package and point users there:
-
-```javascript
-assert.deepEqual(
-  valid('SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txt'),
-  {
-    validForNewPackages: true,
-    validForOldPackages: true,
-    inFile: 'LICENSE.txt'
-  }
-);
-
-assert.deepEqual(
-  valid('SEE LICENSE IN license.md'),
-  {
-    validForNewPackages: true,
-    validForOldPackages: true,
-    inFile: 'license.md'
-  }
-);
-```
-
-If there aren't any licensing terms, use `UNLICENSED`:
-
-```javascript
-var unlicensed = {
-  validForNewPackages: true,
-  validForOldPackages: true,
-  unlicensed: true
-};
-assert.deepEqual(valid('UNLICENSED'), unlicensed);
-assert.deepEqual(valid('UNLICENCED'), unlicensed);
-```
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-86-g962b